Abstract

Professional learning for quality teaching is a lifelong enterprise. Nevertheless, it entails a considerable cost with varying outcomes. Drawing on Snyder’s hope theory and Pantic’s teacher agency, this paper aims to present a model aimed at deepening our understanding of teachers’ intentions and competencies in inclusive education. The model formulates a professional learning cycle tailored to address their unique needs. This study draws on data from a larger qualitative dominant mixed methods study exploring 18 teachers’ professional learning experience with the inclusionED online platform. The process involved a pre-training online survey and interviews and employed multiple strategies for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used for pre-training survey data to assess teacher-participants’ attitudes towards inclusion and efficacy levels in this area. Subsequently, using Snyder’s hope theory and Pantic’s teacher agency, we deductively analysed interview data. The quantitative results showed that teacher-participants had positive beliefs about inclusive education with high efficacy. However, qualitative data analysis uncovered a misalignment between their stated beliefs and enacted beliefs, revealing diverse pathways to both success and challenges in their implementation of inclusive practices. The qualitative analysis, combined with the preliminary survey findings, unveiled four stages of shifting hope: (a) hope “full”, (b) hope “loss”, (c) “wavering” hope, and (d) “flourishing” hope. We discuss how these stages illustrate pathways of teacher professional learning and how this understanding might be used to increase the value and outcomes of professional learning programmes. This study concludes with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications and directions for future research.

Citation

Park, E., McKay, L., Carrington, S, & Harper-Hill, K. (2024). Using hope theory to understand changes from professional learning in inclusive education. British Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 299-320. doi.org/10.1002/berj.4076